Згідно з Наказом Міністерства освіти і науки України від 28.12.2019 № 1643
журнал внесено до Переліку наукових фахових видань України 
(категорії “Б”з економічних наук

Проводимо набір статей до публікації у науковому фаховому журналі "Вісник КНТЕУ" з економічних наук

EXISTENCE OF PERSON’S FREEDOM IN THE PARADIGM OF PROPERTY ETHOS

Автор: Sveta on .

Cite as APA style citation
Kravchenko A. Ekzystencija svobody osobystosti v paradygmi etosu vlasnosti. Visnyk Kyi'vs'kogo nacional'nogo torgovel'no-ekonomichnogo universytetu. 2020. № 1. S. 69-80.

FREE FULL TEXT (PDF)
DOI: http://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2020(129)06

UDC 123.1:159.923.2

KRAVCHENKO Alla,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor at the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences,
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics,
19, Kyoto str., Kyiv, 02156, Ukraine
 
E-mail: Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.
ORCID: 0000-0001-8429-2183

EXISTENCE OF PERSON’S FREEDOM IN THE PARADIGM OF PROPERTY ETHOS

BackgroundHuman life is associated with the property, which is part of his or her existence and freedom. The material and cultural benefits, which are based on the property, are the conditions for self-formation. Property ownership provides institutional structures of political power and rights. The Institute of Private Property plays a key role in promotion of social justice.
The analysis of recent research and publications. The research of the problem of property is actualized in the studies of Modern philosophers and economists. At present, the foundations of the property institute are explored in the context of psychology, philosophy of economics, ethics, and existential anthropology.
The aim. Today, the question of the relation between property and social justice and the right of the individual to existential identity becomes especially important.
Materials and methods. The research is based on structural-functional, paradigmatic approaches, deconstruction method, principles of historicism, non-classicalrationality and critical reflection.
Results. In the history of society, every economic, political, philosophical theory solved the problem of property. Property institute plays a key role in developingsocial justice in people’s lives. Propertyis a guarantee of freedom of activity within the individual sphere. Establishment ofa property instituteis a story ofhuman understanding of themselves as individuals.Property as a condition of self-realization requires a socio-cultural space,free for individual activity. Property exists under the conditions of legal security, which guarantees the order and welfare of society. Property, law and freedom are inseparable.
Conclusion. The essence of human in the social world is determined by the level of development of his or her "Self". Property is an important impetus for the development of society and man. The private property institute is a condition for creating law and order and an efficient economy. Owning a property absorbs the existence of being in the world.
Keywords: property, right, freedom, personality, existence, possession, activity.

REFERENCES

  1. Alchian, А. А., &Demsetz,H. (1973). The Property Right Paradigm. The Journal of Economic History. (Vol. 33), 1, March,(pp. 16-27) [in English].
  2. Betell, T. (2008). Sobstvennost’ i procvetanie [Ownership and prosperity]. Moscow: IRISJeN [in Russian].
  3. Coase,R. E. (1988). The nature of the firm: influence. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization4, 33-48 [in English].
  4. Pipes, Richard(1999). Property and Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf [in English].
  5. Bazylevych, V. D., Gajdaj, T. V., & Nesterenko, O. P. (2018). Aktual’nyj dyskurs eko­nomichnoi’ nauky: paradygmal’ni zrushennja v ekonomichnij teorii’ XXI stolittja [The current discourse of economic science: paradigm shifts in the economic theory of the 21st century]. Ekonomichna teorija – Economic theory1,95-113 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Bazilevich, V. D., & Il’in, V. V. (2015). Jekonomiko-filosofskaja mysl’ sovremennogo mira [The economic and philosophical thought of the modern world]. Кyiv: Znannja [in Russian].
  7. Backus, Matthew, Christopher,Conlon,&Michael,Sinkinson (2019). The Common Ownership Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/ES_20190205_Common-Ownership.pdf [in English].
  8. Butenko, S. (2017). Rozvytok konceptu "vlasnist’": filosofs’ko-psyhologichnyj aspekt [The development of the concept of "property": philosophical and psychological aspect]. Jurydychna psyhologija – Legal psychology1, 48-58 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Bondarchuk, M. M. (2015). Jednist’ svobody ta vidpovidal’nosti u filosofs’ko-pravovij retrospektyvi [The unity of freedom and responsibility in a philosophical and legal pers­pective]. Naukovyj visnyk Uzhgorods’kogo nacional’nogo universytetu – The Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod National University. (Vol. 3), (pp.136-139). Ser. Pravo [in Ukrainian].
  10. Alfred, R. (2017). Mele, Aspects of Agency: Decisions, Abilities, Explanations, and Free Will: Oxford University Press [in English].
  11. Petrenko, M. O. (2017). Filosofija svobody v konteksti problemy ljuds’koi’ gidnosti [The philosophy of freedom in the context of the problem of human dignity]. Naukovyj visnyk – Scientific Bulletin. (Vol.49), (pp. 142-156). Ser. Filosofija [in Ukrainian].
  12. Feldman, G. (2017). Making sense of agency: Belief in free will as a unique and important construct. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1). Article e12293.Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12293 [in English].
  13. Chernobrovkina, V. A. (2015). Vnutrishnja svoboda osobystosti: dosvid psyholo­gichnogo doslidzhennja [Internal personality freedom: the experience of psychological research]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Pedagogichni, psyhologichni nauky ta social’na robota – NaUKMAscientificnotesPedagogicalpsychologicalsciencesandsocialwork. (Vol. 175), (pp. 47-52) [in Ukrainian].
  14. Androshhuk, G. O., & Rabotjagova, L. I. (2017). Mizhnarodna systema ohorony intelek­tual’noi’ vlasnosti: organizacijno-pravovi zasady [NaUKMA scientific notes. Pedagogical, psychological sciences and social work]. Kyiv: Interservis [in Ukrainian].
  15. Pankevych, V., Bilous, I., Omelyanenko, V., Nagornyi, Y., & Sukhostavets, A. (2019). The world market of intellectual property objects and interests of national security of countries. Journal of Security and Sustainability. (Vol. 9(1). (pp. 123-137) [in English].
  16. Umanciv, G., & Martyniv, I. (2019). Global’nyj vymir rozvytku intelektual’noi’ vlasnosti [The global dimension of intellectual property development]. Zovnishnja torgivlja: ekonomika, finansy, pravo – Foreign trade: economics, finance, law2, 86-99. DOI: 10.31617/zt.knute.2019(103)09 [in Ukrainian].
  17. Okhrimenko, A., Boiko, M., Bosovska, M., Melnychenko, S., & Poltavska, O. (2019). Multisubject governance of the national tourism system. Problems and Perspectives in Management. (Vol. 17). Issue 2. (pp. 165-176) [in English].
  18. Wilson, J. Q. (1997). ACureforSelfishness. Wall Street Journal. March 26. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB859326095237603000 [in English].
  19. Fergjuson, N. (2014). Civilizacija: chem Zapad otlichaetsja ot ostal’nogo mira [Civiliza­tion: how the West differs from the rest of the world]. Moscow: AST: CORPUS [in Russian].
  20. BazylevychV. D., & Il’i’n V. V. (2008). Intelektual’na vlasnist’: kreatyvy metafizych­nogo poshuku [Intellectual property: metaphysical search creatives]. Kyiv: Znannja [in Ukrainian].
  21. Berdjaev, N. A. (2001). Filosofija neravenstva. Sud’ba Rossii [The philosophy of inequa­lity.The fate of Russia]. Moscow: JeKSMO-PRESS; Har’kov: Folio [in Russian].
  22. Solov’ev, V. S. (1988). Opravdanie dobra [Justification for the good]. Sochinenija. (Vol.1). Moscow: Mysl’ [in Russian].
  23. Russo, Zh.-Zh. (2001). Pro suspil’nu ugodu, abo Pryncypy politychnogo prava [On social agreement, or Principles of political law]; ukr. per. z fr. ta kom. O. Homa. Кyiv: Port-Royal [in Ukrainian].
  24. Lokk, Dzh. (1988). Sochinenija [Works]. (Vol. 3). Moscow: Mysl’ [in Russian].
  25. Zombart, V. (2004). Burzhua. Evrei i hozjajstvennaja zhizn’ [Bourgeois. Jews and economic life]. Moscow: Ajris-press [in Russian].
  26. Hajek, F. A. (2006). Pravo, zakonodatel’stvo i svoboda: Sovremennoe ponimanie liberal’nyhprincipov spravedlivosti i politiki [Law, legislation and freedom: A modern understan­ding of the liberal principles of justice and politics]. Moscow: IRISJeN [in Russian].
  27. Pipes, Richard. (1990). The Russian Revolution 1899-1919. Collins Harvill, London, 944 p. [in English].
  28. Kravchenko, A., & Kyzymenko, I. (2019). The Forth Industrial Revolution: New Para­digm of Society Development or Posthumanist Manifesto. Philosophy and Cosmology. (Vol.22), (pp. 121-128) [in English].