УВАГА! Нова платформа наукового журналу «SCIENTIA FRUCTUOSA».
Перейти за посиланням -  


Автор: Sveta on .

Cite as APA style citation
Mukoviz V., Leshhij L. Transakcijni vytraty sub’jekta gospodarjuvannja: oblikovo-analitychne zabezpechennja. Visnyk Kyivs’kogo nacional’nogo torgovel’no-ekonomichnogo universytetu. 2021. № 3. S. 133-146.

DOI:  http://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2021(137)10 

UDC 657.471
JEL Classification M41

Candidateof Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor,
Associate Professor at the Department of Accounting and Taxation
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
19, Kioto str., Kyiv, 02156, Ukraine

E-mail: Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.

Candidateof Sciences (Economics),Associate Professor
at the Department of International Economic Relations,
Business and Management of Ukrainian-American Concordia University
8/14, Turhenievska Str., Kyiv,02000, Ukraine

E-mail: Lesya_leshchiyukr.net
ORCID: 0000-0003-2520-0589

Background. Each entity in the course of business has transaction costs (TC) that directly or indirectly affect financial and economic position of an entity. The volume of TC is constantly growing, so we should take them into account in making management decisions, to ensure their monitoring, separate accounting and to record in the books of the entity.
Analysis of recent research and publications has shown that there is a large num­ber of scientific achievements of foreign and domestic scientists, but significant number of issues connected with the importance of reflecting information on transaction costs in accounting and reporting remains unresolved and therefore requires further research.
The aim of the article is to identify the features of the disclosure of transaction costs in accounting of the entity, which are related to the formal principles and standards of its management and the operation of informal institutions that influence management decisions.
Materials and methods. Methods of induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, associations and analogies, empirical were used in the research. The works and the appro­aches of domestic and foreign authors were studied, systematized, detailed and specified.
Results. Transaction costs are increasing and are defined by the researchers and experts as the important element that restrains economic growth in the realities of eco­nomic development in Ukraine. According to the formal rules, the object of accounting is only those transaction costs that are the result of business operations of the entity, recorded in the primary documents and the implementation of which does not contradict national laws. The evidence from practice shows that the methodology of accounting cost provides information about a significant amount of transaction costs that can be identified and measured by the accounting method elements. However, the costs grouping by financial statement items without taking into account the impact of the transactional component does not provide full disclosure in the financial statements of information summarized in the accounting.
Conclusion. Transaction costs, as a category of neo-institutionalism, should be con­sidered through the tasks set by the relevant social institutions. Formal tools for the formation of information about the objects of accounting under the conditions of today can be the accounting policy of the business entity and the professional accountant’s judgment.
The provision of information systems and Internet technologies leads to the auto­matic reduction of TC.
Keywords: transaction costs, business entity, non-institutional economic theory, formal and informal accounting institutions, accounting. 


  1. Douglass, C. (2016). North. Institutions and Economic Theory. The American Econo­mist. (Vol. 61). Issue 1. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0569434516630194[in English].
  2. The new Institutional Economics: Its Start, Its Meaning, Its Prospects (2015). BUSI­NESS LAW. Department of Economics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. 28 Nov. Retrieved from https://lawexplores.com/the-new-institutional-economics-its-start-its-meaning-its-prospects [in English]. 
  3. Markéta, Šumpíková, & Ina, Ďurčeková (2019/2020). Transaction Costs, Outsourcing, and the Public Procurement Review Process in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy. (Vol. XII), 2, Winter, 233-250. Retrieved from https://content.sciendo.comhttps://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0021[in English].
  4. Sina, Shahab, J., Peter, Clinch & Eoin, O’Neill (2018). Accounting for Transaction Costs in Planning Policy Evaluation. Land Use Policy. (Vol. 70), 263-272. Retrieved from http.//orca.cf.ac.uk https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.028[in English]. 
  5. Ljudvenko, D. (2020). Osnovni problemy vyjavlennja transakcijnyh vytrat v oblikovo-informacijnomu zabezpechenni upravlinnja sil’s’kogospodars’kym pidpryjemstvom, zajnjatym v galuzi tvarynnyctva [The main problems of identifying transaction costs in the accounting and information management support of agricultural livestock enterprise]. Ekonomichnyj analiz Economic Analysis. (Vol. 30), 1. Retrieved from http.econa.org.ua [in Ukrainian]. 
  6. Juhymenko-Nazaruk, I. A. (2017). Merezheva koncepcija organizacii’ buhgalters’kogo obliku [Network concept of accounting system]. Naukovyj visnyk Hersons’kogo derzhavnogo universytetu Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Is. 25 (2), 183-186. Retrieved from http://nbuv. gov. ua/UJRN/Nvkhdu_en_2017 [in Ukrainian]. 
  7. The Other Path (1989): The Invisible Revolution In The Third World By Hernando de Soto. 256 p, Harper & Row [in English]. 
  8. Kancurov, O. O. (2014). Instytucional’nyj aspekt buhgalters’kogo obliku [Institutional aspect of accounting]. Kyiv: NNC "IAE" [inUkrainian]. 
  9. Lytvynenko, V. S., & Tolstonog, V. V. (2015). Oblikovo-kontrol’ne zabezpechennja upravlinnja vytratamy: instytucional’nyj pidhid [Accounting and control cost management: an institutional approach]. D.: Fitosociocentr. Retrieved from http://dglib.nubip.edu.ua:8080/ jspui/bitstream/123456789/151/1/Monograph_Lytvynenko.pdf [in Ukrainian]. 
  10. Metelycja, V. M. (2016). Rozvytok buhgalters’koi’ profesii’ v agrarnomu sektori eko­nomiky: teorija, metodologija, praktyka [Development of the accounting profession in the agricultural sector of the economy: theory, methodology, practice]: Doctor’s thesis. NAANU NNC "IAE" [in Ukrainian]. 
  11. Juhymenko-Nazaruk, I. A. (2017). Rozvytok teorii’ i metodologii’ buhgalters’kogo obliku v konteksti neoinstytucional’noi’ teorii’ [Development of accounting theory and metho­do­logy in the context of neo-institutional theory]. Zhytomyr: Vyd. O.O. Jevenok [in Ukrainian]. 
  12. Polozhennja (standart) buhgalters’kogo obliku 16 "Vytraty": Zatv. nakazom MFU vid 31.12.99 № 318 [Regulation (standard) of accounting 16 "Costs": Approved by the order of the MFU from 31.12.99 № 318]. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/z0027-00 [in Ukrainian]. 
  13. Zhuk, V. N. (2013). Osnovy institucional’noj teorii buhgalterskogo ucheta [Foundations of institutional accounting theory]. Kyiv: Agrarnaja nauka [in Ukrainian].
  14. Pushkar, M. S. (2006). Kreatyvnyj oblik (stvorennja informacii’ dlja menedzheriv) [Creative accounting (information generation for managers)]. Ternopil’: Kart-Blansh [inUkrainian]. 
  15. Legenchuk, S. F. (2017). Bagatovariantnist’ v buhgalters’komu obliku: istoryko-teo­retychni aspekty [Multivariance in accounting: historical and theoretical aspects]. Zhytomyr: ZhDTU [inUkrainian]. 
  16. Laburceva, O. I. (2019). Upravlinnja vytratamy pidpryjemstva v konteksti minimizacii’ rivnja transakcijnyh vytrat [Enterprise cost management in the context of minimizing the transaction costs level]. Ekonomichnyj prostir – EconomicSpace150, 61-65 [in Ukrainian].