Cite as APA style citation
Umanciv Ju. Teoretychnyj dyskurs rozvytku korporacij u HHI st. Visnyk Kyivs’kogo nacional’nogo torgovel’no-ekonomichnogo universytetu. 2021. № 3. S. 33-51.

FREE FULL TEXT (PDF)
DOI:  http://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2021(137)03 

UDC 330.87"20"
JEL Classification: G34; L14; O11; P26
 
UMANTSIV Yurii,
Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Professor
at the Department of Economics and Competition Policy
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
19, Kioto str., Kyiv, 02156, Ukraine

E-mail: y.umantsiv@knute.edu.ua
ORCID: 0000-0003-0788-7110

THEORETICAL DISCOURSE OF CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT IN THE XXI CENTURY

 Background. Development of the theoretical concept of corporate entrepreneurship is determined by the intensification of research in modern conditions. The main subject of scientific research is the analysis of the evolution of corporate relations, their organi­zational forms and interaction ways of the main subjects, i.e. owners, managers and the state, as well as the relationship of corporations structural elements. The lack of a holistic concept of corporations’ role substantiation in modern system of economic relations and the scien­tific significance of this issue have led to the relevance of the article.
The analysis of recent research and publications shows that theoretical matrix of corporate entrepreneurship research is at the stage of active transformation of its research field.
The aim of the article is to systematize and generalize theoretical approaches to the analysis of corporate development vectors in the XXI century and also to identify the latest institutional determinants of their functioning.
Materials and methods. The works of Ukrainian and foreign scientists are the theo­retical and methodological basis of the article. The institutional and evolutionary approach is methodological basis of the paper. General scientific research methods such as abstract­tion, analysis and synthesis, systematization, analytical, logical and historical generaliza­tions were also used.
Results. Corporate enterprises in modern conditions of civilizational development are the basis of economic activity, which is based on the use of market relations. It involves the continuous accumulation of extremely large amounts of capital to finance programs and develop technical and technological basis of their operation. Modern corporation is a specific form of organization of economic activity and economic agent, a separate format of social nature of economic relations, which provides deepening social division of labor through horizontal and vertical integration, reproduction of capital, formation of stable integration network relations and institutionalizes socio-economic relations in all dimensions.
Conclusion. The main advantages of the corporate form of entrepreneurship are wide opportunities to attract financial resources, implementation of innovative projects, etc. Corporations are hierarchical network meta-organizations, a form of institutional support for systemic competitiveness and innovative development of the socio-economic system with an integrated model of capital reproduction into organizational terms. Corporation is a social institution of collective action into institutional terms. The corporate form of entre­preneurship makes it possible to increase international competitiveness of the national economy and creates a basis for its development on the basis of neo-industrialization in the context of effective public, social and collective institutions.
Keywords: corporation, corporate entrepreneurship, globalization, digitalization of economic development.
 
REFERENCES
 

1. Filipenko, A. (2020). Cyfrova ekonomika: teoretyko-prykladnyj aspekt [Digitaleconomics: theoreticalandappliedaspect].Ekonomichna teorija – Economic Theory, 2, 54-66.DOI: 10.15407/etet2020.02.054 [in Ukrainian]. 
2. Onyshhenko, V. (2021). Pryroda ekonomichnogo procesu [The nature of the economic process]. Visnyk Kyivs’kogo nacional’nogo torgovel’no-ekonomichnogo universytetu –Herald of Kyiv National University of Trade andEconomics, 1, 23-41. DOI: 10.31617/visnik.knute.2021(135)02 [in Ukrainian]. 
3. Sirko, A. V. (2004). Korporatyvni vidnosyny v perehidnij ekonomici: problemy teorii’ i praktyky [Corporate relations in transition economies: problems of theory and practice]. Kyiv: Imeks [in Ukrainian]. 
4. Gutorov, A. O. (2020). Korporacii’ v suspil’no-ekonomichnij systemi: konceptual’no-teoretychnyj dyskurs [Corporations in the socio-economic system: conceptual and theo­retical discourse].Ekonomika ta derzhava –Economics and State,3,4-10.doi.10.32702/2306-6806.2020.3.4 [in Ukrainian].
5. Suprun, N. A. (2009). Evoljucija vitchyznjanoi’ modeli korporatyvnogo upravlinnja [Evolution of the domestic model of corporate governance]. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian]. 
6. Bilorus, O. (2016). Zakonomirnosti j tendencii’ vidtvorjuval’noi’ evoljucii’ strukturnoi’ transformacii’ global’nogo kapitalu [Regularities and tendencies of reproductive evolu­tion of structural transformation of global capital]. Ekonomichna teorija – Economic Theory, 1, 5-16 https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.01.005[in Ukrainian]. 
7. Gejec’, V. (2020). Fenomen nestabil’nosti – vyklyk ekonomichnomu rozvytku [The phenomenon of instability is a challenge to economic development]. Kyiv: Akadem­periodyka [inUkrainian].
8. Grycenko, A. A. (2018). Cyfrovyj rozvytok: struktura, kapitalizacija ta socializacija [Digital development: structure, capitalization and socialization]. Ekonomichna teorija – Economic Theory, 4. 5-20. DOI: 10.15407/etet2018.04.005 [in Ukrainian]. 
9. Grycenko, O. A. (2018). Cyfrova ekonomika: suchasni vyklyky dlja ekonomistiv ta pravoznavciv [Digital economy: current challenges for economists and lawyers].Ekonomichna teorija ta pravo –Economic Theory and Law, 2, 77-90. DOI:10.31359/2411-5584-2018-33-2-77 [in Ukrainian]. 
10. Cherlenjak, I. I., Proskura, V. F., & Shelemba, M. M. (2020). Tehnologichni vyklyky industrii’ 4.0 ta instrumenty promyslovoi’ polityky: analiz dosvidu Pivdennoi’ Korei’ [Industry 4.0 Technology Challenges and Industrial Policy Tools: An Analysis of South Korea’s Experience]. Naukovyj visnyk Uzhgorods’kogo universytetu – Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Issue 2. 144-156. DOI: 10.24144/2409-6857.2018.2(52).144-156[inUkrainian].
11. Partyn, G. O., Zagorodnij, A. G., & Pylypenko, L. M. (2021). Pidpryjemnyc’ki struk­tury cyfrovoi’ ekonomiky ta problemy ocinjuvannja efektyvnosti i’hn’oi’ dijal’nosti [Entrepreneurial structures of the digital economy and problems of evaluating the effectiveness of their activities]. Finansy Ukrai’ny – Finance of Ukraine, 1, 103-116.DOI: 10.33763/finukr2021.01.103 [in Ukrainian]. 
12. Kindzers’kyj, Ju. (2020). Kiberbezpeka ta stanovlennja cyfrovoi’ ekonomiky: pro­blemy vzajemozv’jazku [Cybersecurity and the Digital Economy: The Problems of Interconnection]. Ekonomichnyj visnyk Dniprovs’koi’ politehniky –Economic Bulletin of the Dnipro Polytechnic, 3, 18-26. DOI: 10.33271/ebdut/71.018 [in Ukrainian]. 
13. Aguilera, R., Marano, V., & Haxhi, I. (2019). International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research. Journal of International Business Studies. Vol. 50. Issue 4. Р. 457-498. DOI: 10.1057/s41267-019-00232-w [in English]. 
14. Strange, R., Cooke, F. (2021)/ Research on international business: The new realities. Inter­national Business Review. 2021. Vol. 30. Issue 2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101794. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348443666_International_Business_Review.[in English].
15. Vanacker T., Zahra S., & Holmes M. (2021) Corporate entrepreneurship, country institutions and firm financial performance. Journal of World Business. (Vol. 56). Issue 3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101162. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090951620300900.[in English].
16. Lagutin, V. (2019). Cyvilizacijni ta instytucijni faktory global’nyh ekonomichnyh transformacij XXI st. [Civilizational and institutional factors of global economic trans­formations of the XXI century]. Zovnishnja torgivlja: ekonomika, finansy, pravo – Foreign trade: economics, finance,law. 2, 5-19. DOI: 10.31617/zt.knute.2019(103)01 [in Ukrainian].
17. Kudrja, Ja. V. (2015). Rozvytok korporacij: zasady, tendencii’, instrumentarij [Cor­porate development: principles, trends, tools]. L’viv. Instytut regional’nyh doslidzhen’ imeni M. I. Dolishn’ogo NAN Ukrai’ny [in Ukrainian]. 
18. Fedulova, L. I. (2015). Tehnologichna polityka: global’nyj kontekst ta ukrai’ns’ka praktyka [Technological policy: global context and Ukrainian practice]. Kyiv: Kyiv. nac. torg.-ekon. un-t [in Ukrainian]. 
19. Mazaraki, A., Bojko, M., Bosovs’ka, M. (2020). Transformacija turyzmu v suspil’stvi 5.0 [Transformation of tourism in Society 5.0]. Visnyk Kyivs’kogo nacional’nogo torgovel’no-ekonomichnogo universytetu – Herald of Kyiv National University of TradeandEconomics,4, 33-54. DOI: 10.31617/visnik.knute.2020(132)03 [in Ukrainian]. 
20. Аmosha, O., Pidorycheva, I., Zemliankin, A. (2021).Trends in the World Economy Development: New Challenges and Prospects. Science and Innovation. Vоl. 17, 1, 3-17. DOI: 10.15407/sci­ne17.01.003 [in English].
21. Bajura, D. O. (2014). Korporatyvne upravlinnja v Ukrai’ni v umovah jevrointegracii’ [Corporate governance in Ukraine in the context of European integration]. Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannja ekonomiky – Theoretical and Applied Issues of Economics. Issue 1. С. 51-59 [in Ukrainian]. 
22. Bilorus, O. (2018). Politekonomichnyj prognoz global’nogo spivrozvytku v XXI stolitti: global’nyj post-kapitalizm chy svit-systema informacijno-merezhevogo globalizmu – [Political-economic forecast of global development in the XXI century: global post-capitalism or world-system of information-network globalism]. Ekonomichna teorija – Economic Theory, 1, 5-20 https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.01.005[in Ukrainian]. 
23. Koval’, V. V., Tyhonova, I. M., Shaposhnykov, K. S., & Jackevych, I. V. (2013). Kor­poratyvne upravlinnja biznes-strukturamy: teorija kreakratii’, rozvytok merezh ta kon­cept samoorganizacii’ pidpryjemnyctva [Corporate management of business structures: the theory of creativity, network development and the concept of self-organization of entrepreneurship]. Odesa: VMV [in Ukrainian]. 
24. Umantsiv, H. V., Martyniv, I. K. (2019). Global’nyj vymir intelektual’noi’ vlasnosti [Global dimension of intellectual property]. Zovnishnja torgivlja: ekonomika, finansy, pravo –Foreign trade: economics, finance, law, 2, 86-99. DOI: 10.31617/zt.knute.2019(103)07 [in Ukrainian]. 
25. Jevrointegracijni priorytety nacional’nogo biznesu (2018) [European integration prio­rities of national business]; A. A. Mazaraki, T. M. Mel’nyk (Eds). Kyiv: Kyiv. nac. torg.-ekon. un-t [in Ukrainian]. 
26. Cooper, M., Nguyen, Q.T.K. (2020). Multinational enterprises and corporate tax planning: A review of literature and suggestions for a future research agenda. International Business Review. Vol. 29. Issue 3. doi.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101692 [in English]. 
27. Strange, R., Zucchella, A. (2017). Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business. Multinational Business Review. Vol. 25. Issue 3. Р. 174-184. DOI: 10.1108/ MBR-05-2017-0028 [in English]. 
28. Haskel, J., Westlake, S. (2018). Capitalism without capital: the rise of the intangible economy. Princeton University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888320[in English]. 
29. Bosovs’ka, M. V. (2015). Integracijni procesy v turyzmi [Integration processes in tourism]. Kyiv: Kyiv. nac. torg.-ekon. un-t [in Ukrainian]. 
30. Popov, O. Je. (2009). Teoretyko-metodologichni ta konceptual’ni zasady formuvannja organizacijno-ekonomichnogo mehanizmu korporatyvnogo upravlinnja [Theoretical, methodological and conceptual principles of formation of organizational and economic mechanism of corporate governance]. Harkiv: INZhEK [in Ukrainian]. 
31. Umantsiv, Yu. (2011). Korporatyvni struktury u systemi ekonomichnyh vidnosyn [Cor­porate structures in the system of economic relations]. Visnyk Kyivs’kogo nacio­nal’nogo torgovel’no-ekonomichnogo universytetu –Herald of Kyiv National University of Trade andEconomics, 3, 13-25 [in Ukrainian]. 
32. Kolot, A. M. (2021). Social’no-trudova real’nist’ – XXI: filosofija stanovlennja, mozh­lyvostej ta vyklykiv [Socio-labor reality – XXI: philosophy of formation, opportunities and challenges]. Ekonomika Ukrai’ny –Economy of Ukraine, 2, 3-31. DOI: 10.15407/ economyukr.2021.02.003 [in Ukrainian]. 
33. Shvab, K. (2019). Chetverta promyslova revoljucija, Formujuchy chetvertu promyslovu revoljuciju [The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Forming the Fourth Industrial Revolution]. Harkiv: Klub simejnogo dozvillja [in Ukrainian]. 
34. Duginec’, G. V. (2018). Global’ni lancjugy vartosti [Global value chains]. Kyiv: Kyiv. nac. torg.-ekon. un-t [inUkrainian].
35. Lagutin, V. D. (2017). Stabil’nist’ suspil’nogo rozvytku: dosvid mizhdyscyplinarnogo doslidzhennja [Stability of social development: experience of interdisciplinary research]. Ekonomichna teorija – Economic Theory, 2, 5-18 https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2017.02.005[in Ukrainian]. 
36. Rogach, O. (2019). Metodologichni aspekty analizu bagatonacional’nyh pidpryjemstv [Methodological aspects of the analysis of multinational enterprises]. Mizhnarodna ekonomichna polityka –International Economic Policy, 2, 7-42. DOI: 10.33111/ iep.2019.31.01 [in Ukrainian].
37. Korsuns’kyj, S. (2020). Zovnishnja polityka v epohu transformacij [Foreign policy in the era of transformations]. Harkiv: Vivat [in Ukrainian]. 
38. Kovalenko, M., Ziuz, D., Smihunova, O., Bondar, N., & Omelchenko, H. (2020). Imple­men­tation of State Economic Policy under Corporatocracy: Financial and Credit Aspect. Public Policy and Аdministration. Vol. 19, 3, 36-47. DOI: 10.5755/ j01.ppaa.19.3.26842 [in English]. 
39. Najbil’shi kompanii’ za rynkovoju kapitalizacijeju [The largest companies by market capitalization]. companiesmarketcap.com. Retrieved from: https://companiesmarketcap.com. (Data zvernennja 01.04. 2021) [in Ukrainian]. 
40. Partrydzh, D. (2017). Ljudy chy prybutok. Lamaj systemu. Zhyvy z metoju. Bud’ uspishnym [People Over Profit: Break the System, Live with Purpose, Be More Successful]. N. Palij (Trans). Kyiv: Knygolav [inUkrainian].
41. Stiglic, Dzh. (2017). Cina nerivnosti [The Price of Inequality]. Kyiv: Tempora [in Ukrainian].
42. Spens, M. (2017). Nova konvergencija [The Next convergence]. Kyiv: Tempora [in Ukrainian].