FREE FULL TEXT (PDF)
DOI:  http://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2019(125)03

UDC 640.011.6-021.387

 
SHKUROPADSKA Diana,
Post-graduate student of the Department of Economic Theory and Competition Policy
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
Ukraine, 02156, Kyiv, Kyoto str., 19

E-mail: Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6883-711X
 

RESILIENCE OF THE HOUSEHOLD SECTOR

Background. At present, the issues of functioning and development of the household sector are not sufficiently studied in the economic literature.Insufficiently investigated institutional aspects of households’ livelihoods and their potential in ensuring the resilienceof the national economy.
The aimof the study is to assess the level of resilienceof the household sector and the analysis of institutional support that will justify ways to increase its level of resilience.
Materials and methods. Theoretical and methodological basis of the research is general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge, the application of which allowed to achieve the set goal.
Research. In the analysis of the resiliencelevel of the household sector, seven indicators will be calculated: final consumer expenditure of households to GDP, share of household loans in gross gross loans, share of households in gross value added, share of households’ disposable income in gross disposable income, housing availability ratio, costs households in the final consumption per capita, the ratio of loans and loans to residential real estate households to total gross loans.The level of resiliencein the household sector is unsatisfactory. Only 2 indicators out of 7 corresponded to the threshold in 2008-2017.An analysis of institutional support for the resilience of the household sector shows that such problems exist as: ineffective government bodies in the conditions of socioeconomic instability; lack of coordination between centers of functional responsibility between state institutions and institutions for ensuring the resilience of the household sector; the imperfection of some legislative acts that are not optimal for a significant share of the household sector.
Conclusion. On the basis of the conducted research it will be advisable to propose ways to increase the level of resilienceof the household sector, which the state must ensure: increase the size of the untaxed minimum income of the Gromadians; introduction of optimal trafficking codes;establishment of reasonable grounds for tax deductions;to provide state support to mortgage lending for the population;reform of the social protection system.

Keywords: household sector, resilienceof the household sector, institutional provision, shock influences.national economy.
 

REFERENCES

1. Tovstyzhenko, O. V. (2018). Finansova spromozhnist’ domohospodarstv v konteksti nahro­madzhennya ta optymizatsiyi yikh dokhodiv ta vytrat [Financial capacity of households in the context of accumulation and optimization of their income and expenses]. Ekonomiko-pravova paradyhma rozvytku suchasnoho suspil’stva –Economic and legal paradigm for the development of modern society, 2, 1-7 [in Ukrainian].
2. Mints, O. YU. (2017). Mekhanizmy formuvannya ta vykorystannya finansiv domohos­podarstv v Ukrayini [Mechanisms for the formation and use of households finance in Ukraine].Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Economics and Intellectual Property, 15,226-231 [in Ukrainian].
3. Tarasyuk, M. V. (2013). Funktsiyi finansiv domohospodarstv u rynkoviy ekonomitsi post­kryzovoho periodu [Functions of households finance in a market economy of post-crisis period]. Ekonomichnyj visnyk universytetu –Economic Herald of the University, 21(1), 230-235 [in Ukrainian].
4. Kizyma, T. O. (2017). Upravlinnya finansamy domashnikh hospodarstv: teoretyko-prahmatychni aspekty [Household Finance management: Theoretically-Pragmatic Aspects].Svit finansiv – Svit finansiv, 4 (21), 22-33[in Ukrainian].
5. Fedunyak, I. O., & Hurs’ka I. S. (2016). Rol’ sil’s’kykh domohospodarstv u rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrayiny [The role of rural households in the development of the Ukrainian economy]. Ahrosvit –AgroSvit, 6, 8-11 [in Ukrainian].
6. Kotys, N. V. (2016). Otsinka instytutsiynoho zabezpechennya rozvytku sektoru domo­hospodarstv [Assessment of institutional support for the development of the household sector]. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Zaporiz’koyi derzhavnoyi inzhenernoyi akademiyi – Econo­mic bulletin of the Zaporizhzhya State Engineering Academy, 6 (1), 51-55 [in Ukrainian].
7. Boyko, A. V. (2014). Mekhanizmy zabezpechennya stiykosti ekonomiky Ukrayiny do hlobal’nykh vyklykiv i ryzykiv suchasnosti [Mechanisms for ensuring the sustainability of the Ukrainian economy to global challenges and risks of the present]. Ekonomika ta upravlinnya natsional’nym hospodarstvom –Economics and management of the nati­onal economy, 3 (46), 34-41 [in Ukrainian].
8. Shtunder, I. O. (2017). Pryroda stiykosti sotsial’noyi sfery v umovakh shokovykh vplyviv [Nature of sustainability of the social sphere in conditions of shock influences]. Ekonomika ta suspil’stvo–Economics and Society, 11, 11-16 [in Ukrainian].
9. Busby, J., & Smith, T. (2014). The creation of a household resilience index using limited data from the IGAD region. Technical Report Series № 1: Measuring Resi­lience in the Horn of Africa. University of Texas, Austin [in English].
10. Nakaz derzhavnoyi sluzhby statystyky Ukrayiny "Klasyfikatsiya instytutsiynykh sekto­riv ekonomiky Ukrayiny" vid 03.12.2004 № 378 [Order of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine "Classification of institutional sectors of the economy of Ukraine" from 03.12.2004 № 378]. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/klasf/st_kls/op_kise_2016.htm[in Ukrainian].
11. Krjuchkova I. V. (2010). Ekonomika Ukrai’ny: shokovi vplyvy ta shljah do stabil’nogo rozvytku [Economy of Ukraine: shock impacts and the way to sustainable develop­ment].Kyiv: In-t ekon. ta prognozuv. NAN Ukrai’ny [in Ukrainian].
12. OECD Home. Economic resilience: Vulnerability indicators. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/eco/growth/economic-resilience.htm[in English].
13. Nakaz Ministerstva ekonomiky Ukrayiny "Metodyka rozrakhunku rivnya ekonomichnoyi bezpeky Ukrayiny":zatverdzheno 19.10.2013. № 1277 [Order of the Ministry of Eco­nomy of Ukraine "Methodology for calculating the level of economic security of Ukraine":zatverdzheno 19.10.2013. № 1277]. Retrieved fromhttp:/ /www.me.gov.ua/Documents/ List?lang=uk-UA&tag=MetodichniRekomendatsii [in Ukrainian].
14. Ofitsiynyy veb-sayt ministerstva finansiv Ukrayiny [Official website of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine]. Retrieved fromhttp://index.minfin. com.ua [in Ukrainian].
15. Ofitsiynyy veb-sayt derzhavnoyi sluzhby statystyky Ukrayiny [Official website of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. Retrieved fromhttp://www. ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
16. Shchoroku blyz’ko 1 mln. ukrayintsiv emihruyut’ z krayiny [Every year about 1 million Ukrainians emigrate from the country]. Ukr. Media. 12.01.2019. Retrieved fromhttps://ukr.media/ukrain/383274 [in Ukrainian].
17. Indeks potochnoyi ekonomichnoyi spromozhnosti: kompleksna otsinka sotsial’no-ekonomichnoyi sytuatsiyi v Ukrayini [The Index of current economic capacity: a com­prehensive assessment of the socioeconomic situation in Ukraine] (2017). Kyiv: Ukrayins’kyy tsentr ekonomichnykh i politychnykh doslidzhen’ imeni Oleksandra Razumkova [in Ukrainian].
18. Nort, D. (2000). Instytutsiyi, instytutsiyna zmina ta funktsionuvannya ekonomiky [Insti­tutions, institutional change and functioning of the economy]. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].