УВАГА! Нова платформа наукового журналу «SCIENTIA FRUCTUOSA».
Перейти за посиланням -  
http://journals.knute.edu.ua/scientia-fructuosa/

SOCIAL CAPITAL: EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT

Автор: Sveta on .

Cite as APA style citation
Kurnosenko A., Sytnyk G. Social’nyj kapital: evoljucija koncepcii’. Visnyk Kyi’vs’kogo nacional’nogo torgovel’no-ekonomichnogo universytetu. 2021. № 5. P. 34-46.

FREE FULL TEXT (PDF)
DOI: http://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2021(139)02

UDC 316:330.14.011
JEL Classification: А13, Е22, F63, J24, M14


KURNOSENKO Anastasiia,
graduate student at the Department of Economics and Business Finance
of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics;
19, Kyoto str., Kyiv, 02156, Ukraine
E-mail: Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.
ORCID0000-0002-3189-1489
 
SYTNYK Hanna,

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor,
Professor at the Department of Economics and Business Finance

of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics;
19, Kyoto str., Kyiv, 02156, Ukraine
E-mail:  Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.
ORCID: 0000-0003-4189-180X

SOCIAL CAPITAL: EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT

Background. The process of social capital formation as a full-fledged scientific theory reflects and explains important social processes. Constant communication and socialization process make new demands on the economy and economic mechanism. Now there are clear periods of technological change for which humanity at the subconscious level is ready and needs it. Most of these processes took place due to the constant functioning of social capital.
The aim of the article is to identify and periodize the main stages of evolution of the social capital concept based on the study of its origin nature, and characteristics of key points that influence further theory process, definition of basic features and structure of social capital.
Materials and methods. The works of foreign and domestic scholars on social capital were studied to solve this goal. Methods of historical and logical generalization, analysis and synthesis, comparison and generalization were used in the paper.
Results. A significant amount of works on this concept has become a prerequisite for identifying and periodizing the evolution stages of the social capital concept: latent, conceptualization, the stage of convergence and pragmatization. The following approaches to the interpretation of social capital were formed in the second stage: sociological, historical, economic, institutional, political science and symbiotic.
The study has confirmed the third stage of development of the social capital theory lasts, which is characterized by significant achievements in understanding its content and role in society, practical implementation of certain methodological provisions, on the one hand, and active discourse and pluralism of views on the social capital concept on the other hand.
Conclusion. Historical retrospection of the formation process of the social capital concept, analysis of scholars’ views on its essence, their synthesis and development have allowed to determine the following main essential characteristics of the "social capital" concept and form its author’s vision as a set of social institutions, relations, norms, values, mutual trust structure. Its parameters affect the formation of other capital forms, management models and benefits in general, which are characterized by interconnectedness with human capital and the historical and cultural development context and management object.
Keywords: social capital, trust, communication network, norms, institutional environment.

REFERENCES

  1. Ryan L. (2016). Looking for Weak Ties: Using a Mixed Methods Approach to Capture Elusive Connections. The Sociological Review, 951-969 [in English].
  2. Membiela-Pollán M., Atilano J., López P. (2016). La teoría del capital social. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Lenovo/Downloads/LaTeoradelCapitalSocial.LibroMembiela-Polln.pdf [in English].
  3. Hamilton, K., Helliwell, J., Woolcock, M. Social Capital, Trust and Well-being in the Evaluation of Wealth. The World Bank. Development Research Group. Poverty and Inequality Team. WPS7707, 020016. June,21 [in English].
  4. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. The Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 70. Is. 5, (p. 2). Investment in Human Beings, (рр. 9-49) [in English].
  5. Loury, G. (1981). No. 4 Intergenerational Transfers and the Distribution of Earnings. Econometrica. The Econometric Society. Vol. 49, (pp. 843-867) [in English].
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, edited by John G. Richardson. New York: Greenwood Press [in English].
  7. Fukuyama, F. (1997). Social capital and the modern capitalist economy: Creating a high trust workplace. Stern Business Magazine,4 [in English].
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 302 [in English].
  9. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democraty Work. Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press [in English].
  10. Woolcock M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory. The World Bank Research Observer15,225-251 [in English].
  11. Shapovalova, T. V. (2016). Social’nyj kapital: teoretychni zasady ta strategii’ transformacii’ [Social capital: theoretical principles and strategies of transformation]. Sjevjerodonec’k: Vyd-vo SNU im. V. Dalja [in Ukrainian].
  12. Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revised. Sociological Theory3,201-233[in English].
  13. Ostrom, E. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Natural Resource Policy Research. Vol. 6 (4), (pp. 235-252) [in English].
  14. Van, Lin N. (2010). Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 278 [in English].
  15. Stephen, K., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 112, 4, (pр. 1251-1288) [in English].
  16. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 27, 1, (pp. 17-40) [in English].
  17. The initiative on defining, monitoring and measuring social capital. web.worldbank.org. Renrieved from https://web.worldbank.org/archive/website00522/WEB/PDF/SCI_W-23.PDF (data zvernennja 17.06.2021) [in English].
  18. Woolcock, M., Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., & Nyhan, V. (2003). Measuring Social Capital An Integrated Questionnaire. The World Bank, 61. Renrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/515261468740392133/pdf/281100PAPER0Measuring0social0capital.pdf [in English].
  19. The Legatum Prosperity Index. www.prosperity.com. Renrieved from https://www.prosperity.com/about/resources (data zvernennja: 14.06.2021) [in English].
  20. Values and the Fourth Industrial Revolution Connecting the Dots Between Value, Values, Profit and Purpose (2016). Global Agenda Council on Values (2014–2016). World Economic Forum, 36 [in English].
  21. Gavkalova, N. L., & Gryshyna, V. V. (2015). Vzajemozv’jazok social’nogo kapitalu ta transakcijnyh vytrat [Relationship between social capital and transaction costs]. Ekonomika rozvytku – Economics of development3(375),54-65 [inUkrainian].