УВАГА! Нова платформа наукового журналу «SCIENTIA FRUCTUOSA».
Перейти за посиланням -  
http://journals.knute.edu.ua/scientia-fructuosa/

ANCIENT GREEK POLISAS THESPACE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THINKING

Автор: Sveta on .

Cite as APA style citation
Lipin M. Davn'ogrec'kyj polis jak prostir rozvytku myslennja. Visnyk Kyi'vs'kogo nacional'nogo torgovel'no-ekonomichnogo universytetu. 2020. № 1. S. 14-27.

FREE FULL TEXT (PDF)
DOI: http://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2020(129)02

UDC 159.955

LIPIN Mykola,
Associate Professor (Philosophy), Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences,
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
Ukraine, 02156, Kyiv, 19, Kioto str.
 
E-mail: Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. вам потрібно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0940-088X

ANCIENT GREEK POLISAS THESPACE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THINKING

Background. At present, the adequate adoption of philosophical technologies for the development of thinking requires the reproduction of the basic parameters of the social-cultural space that contributes to the completeness of thinkingresearch. To do this, it is necessary to turn to the origins of the formation of reflective thinking and philosophy within the ancient Greek democratic polis.
The aim of the article is to investigate the significance of the ancient Greek demo­cratic polisas thespecific social space that enables development of reflective thinking.
Materials and methods. Scientific publications of domestic and foreign authors on the mentioned problemsare used in the article; general analytical and specific research methods have been applied.
Research. The ancient Greek democratic polisforms such a social space in which the development of rational thinking becomes practically necessary. This social order presupposes equality of all its participants, uncertainty and openness of the issue of the common good, dialogue as a way of resolving conflicts. An empty place of power isunder the threat to be filled by deformationanddisintegrationin this social space. In other words, the polisis constantly in a situation of choice between politics and the police, the choice between a "dispute about the common" and "a dispute about governance and power". In view of the above, this social space can be defined as a "shimmering polis" that appears on the periphery of power structures, where the understanding of "normality" becomes less apparent.
Conclusion. Thinking manifests itself in the common being of people as the ability to bring into accordancewith the essence of the matter. A man as a social (political) being brings himself into accordancewith the essence of the matter, not with one another, but with other people. Therefore, thinking is inseparable from common cause (respublic). Thinking in word and in action is directed toward other people. The social space in which thinking will manifest itself must be open, excessiveand free from the domination of rigidhierarchical structures.
Keywords: thinking, philosophy, politics, paideia, democracy, politics, public space.

REFERENCES

  1. Druker, P. (2007). Upravlenie v obshhestve budushhego [Managing in the Next Society]. (E. Trebushnaja, Trans). Moscow: Vil’jams [in Russian].
  2. Lipin, M. (2015). Perspektyvy samovyznachennja ljudyny u sytuacijah nevyznachenosti[Perspectives of human self-determination in situations of uncertainty]. Naukovyj visnykChernivec’kogo universytetu. Filosofija – Scientific Herald of Chernivtsi University. Philosophy.Issue 754-755, 81-86 [in Ukrainian]..
  3. Gorbunova, L. (2012). Myslennja u sviti pljural’nosti: proekt transversal’nogo rozumu V. Vel’sha [Thinking in the World of Plurality: Project of Transversal Reason by W. Welsh]. Filosofija osvity Philosophy of education1-2, 92-110 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Goucha, M. (2007). Philosophy.A school of freedom: Teaching philosophy and lear­ning to philosophize: Status and prospects. Unesco [in English].
  5. Krytychne myslennja: osvita, tvorchist’, cinnosti [Critical thinking: education, creativity,values] (2017). V. G. Kremen’ (Ed.). Kyi’v: Instytut obdarovanoi’ dytyny NAPN Ukrai’ny [in Ukrainian].
  6. Lipman, M.,&Sharp, A.(2017). P4C and rationality in the new world. History, Theory and Practice of Philosophy for Children. Routledge [in English].
  7. Myslennja, piznannja, navchannja: synergija vzajemodii’ [Thinking, cognition, lear­ning: synergy of interaction] (2017). Kyiv: Instytut obdarovanoi’ dytyny NAPN Ukrai’ny [in Ukrainian].
  8. Rans’jer, Zh. (2013). Uchytel’-neznajko. P’jat’ urokiv iz rozkripachennja rozumu [The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation]. A. Rjepa (Ed.). Kyiv: Nika-Centr [in Ukrainian].
  9. Voznjak, V. S. (2019). Nove pedagogichne myslennja: istotni harakterystyky [New Peda­gogicalThinking: Essential Characteristics]. Problemy gumanitarnyh nauk – Problems of the Humanities: zbirnyk naukovyh prac’ Drogobyc’kogo derzhavnogo pedagogich­nogo universytetu imeni Ivana Franka, 41, 43-56. Serija "Filosofija" [in Ukrainian].
  10. Hintikka, Ja. (2014). Filosofskie issledovanija i obshhee obrazovanie [Philosophical Researches and General Education]. Voprosy filosofii – Philosophy Issues4, 84-89 [in Russian].
  11. Brenif’e, O. (2016). Iskusstvo obuchat’ cherez diskussiju [Teaching Through Debate]. (N. Degtjarenko, Trans). Moscow: Mozaika-Sintez [in Russian].
  12. Nussbaum, M. (2014). Ne radi pribyli: zachem demokratii nuzhny gumanitarnye nauki [Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities](M. Bendet, Trans). A. Smirnov (Ed.). Moscow: Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki [in Russian]. 
  13. Jin-Whan, Park. (2014). A study on the evaluation model of moral judgment education. Filosofija osvity – Philosophy of Education,2(15), 210-223 [in English].
  14. Ahutin, A. V. (2014). Filosofskoe sushhestvo evropejskoj kul’tury – Philosophical Beingof European Culture. ARHJe [in Russian].
  15. Voznjak, S. (2019). Ontologichni nachala antychnoi’ filosofii’ [Ontological principles of ancient philosophy]. Visnyk Kyi’vs’kogo nacional’nogo torgovel’no- ekonomichnogo universytetu – Herald of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, 1, 25-37. DOI: 10.31617/visnik.knute.2019(123)03 [in Ukrainian].
  16. Hansen, M. H. et al.(2017). An inventory of archaic and classical poleis. Oxford Uni­versity Press [in English].
  17. Bartlett, A. J. (2015). Badiou and Plato: An Education by Truths: An Education by Truths.Edinburgh University Press [in English].
  18. Arendt, H. (2000). Vita activa, ili O dejatel’noj zhizni [Vita activa, or About Active Life]. (V. V. Bibihin, Trans). SPb.: Aletejja [in Russian].
  19. Jaspers, K. (1991). Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The Meaning and Purpose of History]. (Trans). Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian].
  20. Bibihin, V. V. (2012). Sobstvennost’. Filosofija svoego [Ownership. The Philosophy of Own]. SPb.: Nauka [in Russian].
  21. Aristotel’ (1975). Metafizika [Metaphysics]. (Vols. 1-4). Moscow: Mysl’ [in Russian].
  22. Platon (1993). Sobranie sochinenij [Collected works]. A. F. Losev, V. F. Asmus, A. A. Taho-Godi (Eds.); Trans. (Vols. 1-4). Moscow: Mysl’ [in Russian].
  23. Petrushenko, V. L. (2008). Iov ili o chelovecheskom samostojanii [Job or About HumanSelf-existence ]. L’viv: Novyj svit-2000 [in Russian].
  24. Baumejster, A. et al. (2012). Stan i perspektyvy ukrai’ns’kogo antykoznavstva [The Stateand Prospects of Ukrainian Classical Studies]. Filosofs’ka dumka – Philosophical Thought1, 5-25. Retrieved from http://journal.philosophy.ua/issue/2012-no51 [in Ukrainian].
  25. Hajdegger, M. (2012). Chto jeto takoe – filosofija? Filosofija filosofii [What is Philo­sophy? Philosophy of Philosophy]. V. Kuznecov (Ed.). Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt [in Russian].
  26. Losev, A. F. (1991). Istorija filosofii kak shkola mysli. Filosofija. Mifologija. Kul’tura [History of Philosophy as School of Thought. Philosophy. Mythology. Culture]. Moscow:Politizdat [in Russian].
  27. Gegel’, G. V. F. (1932). Lekcii po istorii filosofii [Lectures on the History of Philosophy]. (B. Stolpner, Trans). Moscow: Partizdat [in Russian].
  28. Solov’ev, V. S. (1988). Istoricheskie dela filosofii [Historical Affairs of Philosophy]. Voprosy filosofii – PhilosophicalIssues8, 118-125 [in Russian].
  29. Mamardashvili, M. K. (1996). Neobhodimost’ sebja. Lekcii. Stat’i. Filosofskie zametki [The need for yourself. Lectures. Articles. Philosophical Notes]. Ju. P. Senokosov (Ed.). Moscow: Labirint [in Russian].
  30. Ado, P. (2014). Shho take antychna filosofija?[What is Ancient Philosophy?]. (S. L. Josypenko, Trans). Kyiv: Novyj Akropl’ [in Ukrainian].
  31. Ado, P. (2005). Filosofskaja rech’ kak duhovnoe uprazhnenie. Filosofija kak sposob zhit’:Besedy s Zhanni Karlie i Arnol’dom I. Djevidsonom [Philosophical Discourse as Spiritual Exercise. Philosophy as a Way of Life: Conversations with Jeanne Carlier and Arnold I. Davidson]. V. A. Vorob’ev (Ed.). Moscow; SPb.: Stepnoj Veter; Kolo [in Russian].
  32. Fuko, M. (2007). Germenevtika sub#ekta: kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1981/82 uchebnom godu [Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the College de France 1981-1982]. (A. G. Pogonjajlo, Trans).  SPb.: Nauka [in Russian].
  33. Aristotel’ (2000). Polityka [Politics].(Trans). Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].
  34. Mjuller, D. (2015). Razum, religija, demokratija [Reason, Religion, and Democracy]. (A. A. Stoljarov, Trans). Moscow: Mysl’ [in Russian].
  35. Vernan, Zh.-P. (1988). Proishozhdenie drevnegrecheskoj mysli [The Origin of Ancient Greek Thought ]. (F. K. Kessidi, Trans). Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
  36. Frolov, Je. D. (2004). Rozhdenie grecheskogo polisa [The Birth of the Greek Polis].2ed. SPb.: Izd-vo SPb. un-ta [in Russian].
  37. Lefor, K. (2000). Politicheskie ocherki (XIX-XX veka) [Political Essays (19th-20th Centuries)]. (Trans). Moscow: ROSSPJeN [in Russian].
  38. Rans’er, Zh. (2006). Na kraju politicheskogo [On the Shores of Politics]. (B. M. Skuratov,Trans). Moscow: Praksis [in Russian].
  39. Erohov, I. A. (2002). O vozmozhnosti politicheskoj morali [On the Possibility of Poli­tical Morality]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija – Polis. Politicalresearches,4, 121-134 [in Russian].
  40. Ahutyn, A. V. (2015). Evropa – forum myra [Europe is the World Forum]. Kyiv: Duh i Litera [in Russian].
  41. Hajdegger, M. (1993). Uchenie Platona ob istine. Vremja i bytie [Plato’s Doctrine of Truth.Time and Being]. vstupit. st., komment. V. V. Bibihin. Moscow: Respublika [in Russian].
  42. Hajdegger, M. (2006). Chto zovetsja myshleniem? [What is Called Thinking?]. Je. Sagetdinov, Trans). Moscow: Territorija budushhego [in Russian].
  43. Shtraus, L. (2012). Presledovanie i iskusstvo pis’ma [Persecution and the Art of Writing]. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie – Sociological Review. (Vol.11), 3, 12-25 [in Russian].
  44. Shtraus, L. (2000). Chto takoe klassicheskoe obrazovanie? Vvedenie v politicheskuju filosofiju [What is Classical Education? Introduction to Political Philosophy]. (M. Fetisova, Trans). Moscow: Logos, Praksis [in Russian].
  45. Bibihin, V. "Vitaactiva" Hanny Arendt. www.bibikhin.ru.Retrievedfromhttp://www.bibikhin.ru/vita_aktiva_hanni_arendt [in Russian].