УВАГА! Нова платформа наукового журналу «SCIENTIA FRUCTUOSA».
Перейти за посиланням -  
http://journals.knute.edu.ua/scientia-fructuosa/

STRUCTURE OF A "NEW SOCIETY" CONCEIVABLE FOR THE DIGITAL REVOLUTION

Автор: Sveta on .

 FREE FULL TEXT (PDF)
DOI: http://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2018(120)10

UDC 004.738.5:316.3
 
LANG Franz Peter,
Doctor of Science, Honored Doctor, Professor at Technical University of Braunschweig,
Carl Friedrich Gauss Faculty, Department of Economic Science
 
STRUCTURE OF A "NEW SOCIETY" CONCEIVABLE FOR THE DIGITAL REVOLUTION
 

The ideas of a new social and economic concept as the basis of the era of the digital revolution areconsidered. It has been determined that"Entrepreneurs" and "Intrapreneurs" will be of primary importance in the future. It has been predicted how a new economic society can look like, what forms of labor organization can be expected, and how it can ensure a high level of employment.
 
Keywords: Balanced Society, Big Data, Digital Revolution, Differentiation Society, Entrepreneurs,
Flat Hierarchies, Intrapreneurs, New Communication Channels, Virtual Companies, Self-realization.

REFERENCES

  1. Technopedia (2017). Digital Revolution. URL : https://www.techopedia.com/ definition/23371/digital-revolution.
  2. Pääkkönen Päkaa/Pakala, Daniel (2015). Reference Architecture and Classification of Technologies, Products and Services for Big Data Systems. URL : Big Data Research, Volume 2, Issue 4.  2015. December. P.166–86.
  3. Lane David/Maxfield, Robert/Read, Dwight W./van der Leeuw, Sander (2009): From Population to Organization Thinking, in: D. Lane et al. (eds.), Complexity Perspectives in Innovation and Social Change, Methodos Series 7, DOI 10.1007/ 978-1-4020-9663-1, Springer Science&Business Media B.V. Open Access Publications from the University of California. URL : https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7756s3zw.
  4. Lang Franz Peter(1999). Innovations- und Edukationssysteme im Spannungsfeldvon Gruppeninteressen, in: Rebe, Bernd et al. eds.: Humanität – Wandel – Utopie, Hildesheim, Zürich, New-York. P.107–130.
  5. Rohleder Franz(2017). US-Präsident Donald Trump: Seine Ziele und sein Wahlprogramm, in: Merkur. URL : https://www.merkur.de/politik/us-praesident-donald-trump-seine-ziele-und-sein-wahlprogramm-zr-6960945.html.
  6. Kurz Sebastian(2018). Die Regierung steht. URL : https://secure.sebastian-kurz.at/regierungsverhandlungen/programm.
  7. Wetzker Konrad/Strüven, Peter/Bilmes, Linda J. (1989) (eds.). Gebt uns das Risiko zurück: Strategien für mehr Arbeit, Wien.
  8. Porter Michael E.(1962). Wettbewerbsstrategie, 7. Aufl., Frankfurt/Main.
  9. Casey Catherine(1995). Work, Self and Society, London.
  10. Dahl Gorden(1972). Work, Play, and Worship in a Leisure-oriented Society, Augsburg Publishing House.
  11. Luhmann Nicolas(1977). Differentiation of Society, in: The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, Vol. 2. № 1. Р. 29–53.
  12. Kijima Kyoichi (2001).Why Stratification of Networks Emerges in Innovative Society: Intelligent Poly-Agent Systems Approach. URL : Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory. 2001. June. Vol. 7, Is. 1. Р. 45–62.
  13. Dömes Karl(2016). Das ist die Arbeitswelt von morgen, in: Frankfurter Rundschau 19. 11. 2016. URL : http://www.fr.de/wirtschaft/arbeit-soziales/digitalisierung-das-ist-die-arbeitswelt-von-morgen-a-289976.
  14. Gandomi Amyr/Hayder,Mutaza (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. URL : International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 35, Is. 2, April. 2015. Р. 137–144.
  15. Van der Leeuw,Sander (2015). For every solution there are many problems: The role and study of technical systems in socio-environmental coevolution, in: Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography. Vol. 112. № 2. November. Р. 105–116.
  16. Nelson Richard L.(ed.) (1993). National Innovation Systems: A comparative Analysis,  Oxford University Press.
  17. INSITE(2017). The Innovation Society. URL : http://www.insiteproject.org/perspectives/innovation-society.